Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Dukungan Organisasi Terhadap Self-efficacy dalam Penerapan Teknologi: Literature Review
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Keywords

Beban kerja
dukungan organisasi
self-efficacy
teknologi kesehatan
rumah sakit

How to Cite

Nainggolan, E. E., & Tarigan, E. (2026). Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Dukungan Organisasi Terhadap Self-efficacy dalam Penerapan Teknologi: Literature Review. Journal of Nursing Innovation, 5(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.61923/jni.v5i1.91

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Penerapan teknologi kesehatan di rumah sakit menjadi kebutuhan utama dalam meningkatkan mutu pelayanan dan keselamatan pasien. Namun, implementasi teknologi sering kali dihadapkan pada tantangan beban kerja yang meningkat serta keterbatasan dukungan organisasi. Kondisi tersebut dapat memengaruhi self-efficacy tenaga kesehatan dalam menggunakan teknologi secara optimal.

Tujuan: Literature review ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh beban kerja dan dukungan organisasi terhadap self-efficacy tenaga kesehatan dalam penerapan teknologi di rumah sakit.

Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode literature review dengan pencarian artikel melalui database PubMed, ProQuest, dan Google Scholar. Artikel diseleksi menggunakan strategi PICOT dan alur PRISMA. Artikel yang terpilih dievaluasi menggunakan Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools.

Hasil: Hasil review menunjukkan bahwa beban kerja yang tinggi cenderung menurunkan self-efficacy tenaga kesehatan dalam penggunaan teknologi, sedangkan dukungan organisasi seperti dukungan supervisor, pelatihan, dan ketersediaan fasilitas berperan meningkatkan self-efficacy dan kesiapan dalam penerapan teknologi.

Kesimpulan: Beban kerja dan dukungan organisasi merupakan faktor penting yang memengaruhi self-efficacy dalam penerapan teknologi di rumah sakit. Penguatan dukungan organisasi diperlukan untuk meminimalkan dampak negatif beban kerja.

https://doi.org/10.61923/jni.v5i1.91
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876

Bandura,A (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

Carayon, P., Schoofs Hundt, A., Karsh, B. T., Gurses, A. P., Alvarado, C. J., Smith, M., & Flatley Brennan, P. (2006). Work system design for patient safety: The SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(Suppl 1), i50–i58. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015842

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Havaei, F., MacPhee, M., & Dahinten, V. S. (2019). The effect of nursing care delivery models on quality and safety outcomes of care: A cross-sectional survey study of medical–surgical nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(10), 2234–2245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13997

Holden, R. J. (2011). What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements? A study of facilitators and barriers to physicians’ use of electronic health records. Journal of Patient Safety, 7(4), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182388cfa

Holden, R. J., Brown, R. L., Scanlon, M. C., & Karsh, B. T. (2012). Modeling nurses’ acceptance of bar coded medication administration technology at a pediatric hospital. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(6), 1050–1058. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000709

Joanna Briggs Institute. (2020). JBI critical appraisal tools. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

Karsh, B. T., Weinger, M. B., Abbott, P. A., & Wears, R. L. (2010). Health information technology: Fallacies and sober realities. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(6), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.005637

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statem

ent. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460

Sitorus, R., & Yulia. (2024). Model praktik keperawatan profesional di rumah sakit dan panduan implementasi (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Sagung Seto.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Zhang, X., Guo, X., Lai, K. H., & Guo, F. (2014). How does IT infrastructure affect performance? The mediation of process capabilities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222310

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Endah Ernawati Nainggolan, Emiliana Tarigan

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.